Wikipedia:Requests for comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service
 | This version of the page may not reflect the most current changes. Please purge this page to view the most recent changes. |
Biographies
[edit]| Is Barry Keoghan's former relationship to pop star Sabrina Carpenter notable enough to be included in his article? PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 05:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
| Should the current article portrait be changed from her official black and white portrait to a portrait in color? Anakinguy788 (talk) 18:04, 29 January 2026 (UTC) |
Talk:Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
How should we format his place of birth in the infobox?
Thedarkknightli (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC) |
| Should the article split from Life and career to Early life and Career as well as adding Personal life section? Octaviyanti Dwi Wahyurini (talk) 03:40, 18 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)
| :As a followup to 2025 RFC on Baltic bios infoboxes, 1940 to 1991. Which versions of the 2025 RFC infobox decision, should be used?
Examples:
|
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
The following questions are regarding this footnote on J.K. Rowling regarding proposed gender self-recognition law reformsthat Rowling opposes.
|
Which of the following labels should be used to describe Nick Shirley in the lead?
01:58, 15 January 2026 (UTC) |
| Should the 24 counts of hacking that Assange pleaded guilty to in 1996 in Australia be included in the infobox?Jack Upland (talk) 00:23, 15 January 2026 (UTC) |
| Previously, a free image of Carson Garrett (File:Carson Garrett (cropped).jpg) was added but then removed last year. Reinsert it? 22:51, 13 January 2026 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
There's been a bit of discussion on this topic, but I think it's important that we come to a consensus. The question is: What should be included after "He was the first Israeli prime minister to have been born in?" Here are some options:
|
| Should the infobox of this article have a footnote explaining that the USSR annexation of Estonia was widely disputed in its legality/validity by the international community? (Example version [4]) Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC) |
| What image should be used in the infobox? --Bakir123 (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC) |
| The article has for years included two sentences and a photo about the removal of protesters from D.C.'s Lafayette Square park in June 2020 and Trump's subsequent photo-op with a Bible. Should this content be removed? 22:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC) |
Economy, trade, and companies
[edit]| Should an article about a multinational business include references to "occupied territories", "cultural appropriation", genocide, apartheid and political boycotts when the references are based only on the possible location of one of several manufacturing plants and the name of the shell company that owns the operating company that runs the business? There is no suggestion that any executives or employees are engaged in these things.
This began with a request from a COI editor to remove non-WP:RS sources and asking for an addition to the "cultural appropriation" discussion. After three months of discussion, I posted that I would remove the content rather than changing the sources. There was no response. Talk:Moroccanoil#Request edit, October 2025 Eight hours after I made the change, it was reverted by an editor who had not participated in the earlier discussion. I added another section to the talk page, Talk:Moroccanoil#National allegiance of Moroccanoil. This produced a long and un-WP:CIVIL discussion. It revealed, among other things, that the editor's opinion is based on WP:OR from interpreting the legal disclaimers on the company's websites. The editor who made the reversion has been involved in this issue before, and engaged in edit wars. Addition of a tag in 2024 was reverted 19 minutes later. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moroccanoil&diff=next&oldid=1226760728 Elimination of the supposed national identity was altered in 1:24 and an edit war followed. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moroccanoil&diff=1226475555&oldid=1226463207 Julian in LA (talk) 03:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
| Should we include cities where Waymo has announced future expansion, but hasn't actually started service yet?
Arguments in favor of inclusion:
Argument against inclusion: (@Graywalls: feel free to add more here) Numberguy6 (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2026 (UTC) |
Should a Major Projects section be added to the Maire Tecnimont article? If so, please choose between the
and the
Please answer Short, Long, or No or the equivalent, with a brief statement, in the Survey. The Discussion section is provided to discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:15, 1 February 2026 (UTC) |
History and geography
[edit]| I am requesting wider community input regarding multiple sourcing and accuracy issues in this article.
A detailed breakdown of the problems has been provided above on this talk page, but in summary the concerns include:
Several of these issues originate from a series of edits by one contributor, and despite partial later corrections, many problematic statements and citations remain in the article. I would appreciate independent evaluation of whether the current content meets Wikipedia’s standards for verifiability, accurate use of sources, and reliable sourcing, and guidance on how these sections should be corrected. Thank you for your time and input. Аксамит (talk) 19:37, 30 January 2026 (UTC) |
Talk:Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
How should we format his place of birth in the infobox?
Thedarkknightli (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC) |
| Which of the following should be this article's lead image? 15:06, 25 January 2026 (UTC) |
| This Request for Comment seeks community input on whether the current article framing accurately reflects what reliable sources explicitly establish.
Specifically: – Do the cited sources explicitly and consistently support presenting the events as “genocide”, including casualty figures and inferred intent, as settled facts without attribution? – Or should these elements be more carefully attributed or contextualized in line with WP:V, WP:SYNTH, WP:UNDUE, and WP:LABEL? |
| Should the lead definition include a mention of intent to destroy (or aim to destroy) Slava570 (talk) 22:11, 20 January 2026 (UTC) |
| Should the main list at List of largest empires#Empires at their greatest extent have a minimum area threshold for inclusion? TompaDompa (talk) 06:17, 17 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)
| :As a followup to 2025 RFC on Baltic bios infoboxes, 1940 to 1991. Which versions of the 2025 RFC infobox decision, should be used?
Examples:
|
What should we write as the end date of the Kursk campaign?
Discussion before the RfC: Talk:Kursk campaign#It's over and has been over for a while and Talk:Kursk campaign#Date parameter and Talk:Kursk campaign#Result parameter. TurboSuperA+[talk] 10:20, 10 January 2026 (UTC) |
Language and linguistics
[edit]Maths, science, and technology
[edit]| In this article's opening statement Dead Internet Theory is defined as a "conspiracy theory" rather than just a theory (or a different term altogether). Is the usage of the word "conspiracy" in the article's opening line too loaded of a term? While it does not technically violate WP standards (some reputable secondary sources use the word conspiracy in the context of the theory), does the inclusion of the term act in detriment to the article's quality? Should it be removed or changed?
14:31, 2 February 2026 (UTC) |
| Should the 24 counts of hacking that Assange pleaded guilty to in 1996 in Australia be included in the infobox?Jack Upland (talk) 00:23, 15 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Image use policy
| One of the valid uses of AI-generated imagery in articlespace is to illustrate AI-related topics and notable AI-generated images. For these cases, should we modify the policy to indicate a preference for images used by reliable sources (assuming there are no licensing concerns)? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:06, 9 January 2026 (UTC) |
Art, architecture, literature, and media
[edit]| Should the opening of the article be "Melania is a 2026 American documentary film" or "Melania is a 2026 American propaganda film"/some variant that includes propaganda?
Please be advised that posting a verbose and giant wall of text is not helpful to the conversation. Jon698 (talk) 03:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
| I floated this at |
Talk:Act III: This City Made Us
| Should the last sentence of the Plot section read:
A. Light sees "a flash of blue" in the crowd as the rope slips around his neck and thinks of Emily before being hanged in front of the crowd. (the current wording) or B. Light sees "a flash of blue" in the crowd as the rope slips around his neck and thinks of Emily. A loud slamming sound is heard, followed by creaking. ? Robert McClenon (talk) 06:16, 23 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
The following questions are regarding this footnote on J.K. Rowling regarding proposed gender self-recognition law reformsthat Rowling opposes.
|
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films)
Should the provision at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films)#Upcoming films regarding considering recent pageviews to retain redirects with titles ending with the disambiguator "(upcoming film)" be adjusted, removed, not changed, or something else? Steel1943 (talk) 22:33, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Previously, a free image of Carson Garrett (File:Carson Garrett (cropped).jpg) was added but then removed last year. Reinsert it? 22:51, 13 January 2026 (UTC) |
Talk:Lists of American universities and colleges
 I am requesting broader community input on whether state-level education maps (showing locations of colleges and universities by state) should be included in List of colleges and universities in ____ articles or related pages. Not allowing these maps will basically ban me from making any maps in the future. I also put a lot of work into the Tables, which could be a good resource for college hunting for students. Concerns have been raised about legibility and color contrast (which has been resolved). Should these maps be included? Wikideas1 (talk) 18:05, 9 January 2026 (UTC) |
Politics, government, and law
[edit]| * Should this article mention Pretti's video recorded confrontation with ICE that occured eleven days before his shooting in the "Background" section?
Option 1. Include information on this event in the "Background" section of this article Option 2. Don't include information on this event in the "Background" section of this article ALittleClass (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
| Should the opening of the article be "Melania is a 2026 American documentary film" or "Melania is a 2026 American propaganda film"/some variant that includes propaganda?
Please be advised that posting a verbose and giant wall of text is not helpful to the conversation. Jon698 (talk) 03:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
Talk:List of pro-Russian political parties
| What links do you think will be more appropriate in terms of suitability and neutrality to include in "See also" section of this article? Choose at least 3. Gigman (talk) 09:42, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Is HOPE not hate a reliable source?
Previous discussions: August 2018, April 2019, February 2025. TurboSuperA+[talk] 23:17, 26 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics
| Should minor parties and independent candidates be included in Australian election infoboxes? Politics has experienced shifts with different minor parties and the "teal independents" gaining seats in 2022 and retaining them in 2025, in addition to opinion polling showing a One Nation surge for the next election.
The original discussion has gotten us to a place where we can form a consensus but I want that to be formalised through a Request for Comment. Mentioning users from original discussion: @Wikiuser4999, @Onetwothreeip, @LivelyRatification, @ITBF, and @Commander Keane. Qwerty123M (talk) 03:31, 23 January 2026 (UTC) |
| Should the lead definition include a mention of intent to destroy (or aim to destroy) Slava570 (talk) 22:11, 20 January 2026 (UTC) |
Template talk:Infobox U.S. state
| Should a note be placed next to the "Secretary of State" or "Senate President" entries? GoodDay (talk) 21:22, 20 January 2026 (UTC) |
I'm starting an RFC due to a suggestion from a fellow editor.
Which one should be implemented?
|
| Should the circular emblem (File:Seal of the President of the Republic of Korea.svg) currently in the infobox be removed? notadev (talk) 15:25, 17 January 2026 (UTC) |
Talk:2020s Minnesota fraud scandals
| Which version of the lead should be used? ~2026-32437-2 (talk) 05:47, 17 January 2026 (UTC) |
| Should the gif in the infobox be removed? Joko2468 (talk) 14:28, 16 January 2026 (UTC) |
Which of the following labels should be used to describe Nick Shirley in the lead?
01:58, 15 January 2026 (UTC) |
| Should the 24 counts of hacking that Assange pleaded guilty to in 1996 in Australia be included in the infobox?Jack Upland (talk) 00:23, 15 January 2026 (UTC) |
There's been a bit of discussion on this topic, but I think it's important that we come to a consensus. The question is: What should be included after "He was the first Israeli prime minister to have been born in?" Here are some options:
|
| Should the infobox of this article have a footnote explaining that the USSR annexation of Estonia was widely disputed in its legality/validity by the international community? (Example version [10]) Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC) |
| What image should be used in the infobox? --Bakir123 (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC) |
| There have been multiple disputes over whether a label of "far-right" should be included as a descriptor for Reform UK, should the label be included in the article's lead section and infobox? – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 01:05, 11 January 2026 (UTC) |
| The article has for years included two sentences and a photo about the removal of protesters from D.C.'s Lafayette Square park in June 2020 and Trump's subsequent photo-op with a Bible. Should this content be removed? 22:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC) |
Religion and philosophy
[edit]Talk:Antioch International Movement of Churches
| Should the Antioch International Movement of Churches article include the following precise, sourced wording for the 2025 River Church Banff incident, noting the senior leadership response and regulatory inquiry, reflecting precise conviction language, attribution, and proportional coverage?
Proposed wording: "In 2025, a youth leader at Antioch affiliate River Church Banff was convicted of "repeatedly sexually touching a 14-year-old boy" and placed on the sex offenders register. According to The Times, the conduct involved inappropriately stroking the boy beginning in 2022. The Press and Journal and The Times report that the church's senior leadership, lead pastor Rob McArthur and founding elder Joe Ewen, were aware of the behavior for several months before the family and police were notified. Parents of the victim spoke of how their son was "betrayed" by their church, saying the leadership repeatedly "downplayed" concerns about grooming and prioritized protecting the public image of the church. After the victim’s family approached Antioch Waco in 2023, McArthur and Ewen issued a joint apology. Media coverage also noted River Church Banff's formal link to Antioch Waco, including receipt of staff salaries and hosting missionaries from the United States. Following reporting, the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator opened an inquiry into the church's trustees." Arguments for inclusion:
Arguments for removal or trimming:
Questions for comment: 1. Does this proposed wording accurately reflect the sources, remain neutral, and maintain due weight in the article? 2. Should the senior leadership names be included, considering sourcing, notability, and accountability under WP:BLP? 3. Does the proposed summary appropriately reflect the incident’s coverage and significance, while remaining proportional in length? HonestHarbor (talk) 17:43, 8 January 2026 (UTC) |
Society, sports, and culture
[edit]| Should this article include an an external link to the website?
(Reactivated RfC for more comment on the sensitive topic, particularly in light of previous threads on talk page, see e.g. previous RfC, thread 1, thread 2) Szmenderowiecki (talk · contribs) 01:20, 1 February 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Olympics
| Starting an RfC on the placement of Template:2026 Winter Olympics and Template:2024 Summer Olympics (and all similar templates) across main Olympic Games articles such as 2026 Winter Olympics and 2024 Summer Olympics.
Until earlier this month, these templates have been located directly below the infobox, usually within the introduction. As their recent removal, appears to impact navigability to other related articles such as 2024 Summer Olympics Parade of Nations. Open to suggestions on if they should be re-added as before, relocated elsewhere within the main article, or completely removed. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 21:39, 27 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League
| Should NFL conference championship games be notable enough for their own articles? ~2026-37153-4 (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
The following questions are regarding this footnote on J.K. Rowling regarding proposed gender self-recognition law reformsthat Rowling opposes.
|
Talk:Antioch International Movement of Churches
| Should the Antioch International Movement of Churches article include the following precise, sourced wording for the 2025 River Church Banff incident, noting the senior leadership response and regulatory inquiry, reflecting precise conviction language, attribution, and proportional coverage?
Proposed wording: "In 2025, a youth leader at Antioch affiliate River Church Banff was convicted of "repeatedly sexually touching a 14-year-old boy" and placed on the sex offenders register. According to The Times, the conduct involved inappropriately stroking the boy beginning in 2022. The Press and Journal and The Times report that the church's senior leadership, lead pastor Rob McArthur and founding elder Joe Ewen, were aware of the behavior for several months before the family and police were notified. Parents of the victim spoke of how their son was "betrayed" by their church, saying the leadership repeatedly "downplayed" concerns about grooming and prioritized protecting the public image of the church. After the victim’s family approached Antioch Waco in 2023, McArthur and Ewen issued a joint apology. Media coverage also noted River Church Banff's formal link to Antioch Waco, including receipt of staff salaries and hosting missionaries from the United States. Following reporting, the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator opened an inquiry into the church's trustees." Arguments for inclusion:
Arguments for removal or trimming:
Questions for comment: 1. Does this proposed wording accurately reflect the sources, remain neutral, and maintain due weight in the article? 2. Should the senior leadership names be included, considering sourcing, notability, and accountability under WP:BLP? 3. Does the proposed summary appropriately reflect the incident’s coverage and significance, while remaining proportional in length? HonestHarbor (talk) 17:43, 8 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia style and naming
[edit]Talk:List of pro-Russian political parties
| What links do you think will be more appropriate in terms of suitability and neutrality to include in "See also" section of this article? Choose at least 3. Gigman (talk) 09:42, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
|
Talk:Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
How should we format his place of birth in the infobox?
Thedarkknightli (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
| I floated this at |
Talk:Catherine, Princess of Wales
| I'd like to raise a quick style point for consensus: should this article include a comma after fronted year phrases such as "In 2011, ..."?
Another editor has noted that comma placement isn't regulated by ENGVAR, so it's up to local consensus whether to include or omit the comma. With that in mind, I wanted to ask what the preferred approach should be here. Several royal Featured Articles — including Queen Victoria, George VI, and Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother — consistently include the comma after "In [year]," and it seems to improve readability by preventing the opening of the sentence from running together. By contrast, the articles on Catherine, William, and their children tend to omit the comma, which makes them outliers compared with most other royal biographies. For the sake of consistency across these closely related pages, it would be helpful to decide whether these articles should follow the broader FA precedent. For my part, I support including the comma after "In [year],". It keeps this article consistent with the wider set of royal biographies, most of which already use that style, and it does improve readability. I'm not sure why the Catherine, William, and Wales children's pages use a different approach when the majority of comparable royal articles include the comma, so aligning the style here seems the clearer and more consistent option. I'm happy to follow whatever consensus forms — I just wanted to raise the point so we can settle on one consistent approach. ItsShandog (talk) 14:46, 25 January 2026 (UTC) |
Template talk:Infobox Australian place
Should Template:Infobox Australian place be updated to support the aliases |first_nations_name= and |indigenous_name= for the existing |native_name= parameter? Poketama (talk) 22:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Which of the following varieties of English should this article have? Doug Weller talk 15:02, 19 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Image use policy
| One of the valid uses of AI-generated imagery in articlespace is to illustrate AI-related topics and notable AI-generated images. For these cases, should we modify the policy to indicate a preference for images used by reliable sources (assuming there are no licensing concerns)? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:06, 9 January 2026 (UTC) |
Talk:Antioch International Movement of Churches
| Should the Antioch International Movement of Churches article include the following precise, sourced wording for the 2025 River Church Banff incident, noting the senior leadership response and regulatory inquiry, reflecting precise conviction language, attribution, and proportional coverage?
Proposed wording: "In 2025, a youth leader at Antioch affiliate River Church Banff was convicted of "repeatedly sexually touching a 14-year-old boy" and placed on the sex offenders register. According to The Times, the conduct involved inappropriately stroking the boy beginning in 2022. The Press and Journal and The Times report that the church's senior leadership, lead pastor Rob McArthur and founding elder Joe Ewen, were aware of the behavior for several months before the family and police were notified. Parents of the victim spoke of how their son was "betrayed" by their church, saying the leadership repeatedly "downplayed" concerns about grooming and prioritized protecting the public image of the church. After the victim’s family approached Antioch Waco in 2023, McArthur and Ewen issued a joint apology. Media coverage also noted River Church Banff's formal link to Antioch Waco, including receipt of staff salaries and hosting missionaries from the United States. Following reporting, the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator opened an inquiry into the church's trustees." Arguments for inclusion:
Arguments for removal or trimming:
Questions for comment: 1. Does this proposed wording accurately reflect the sources, remain neutral, and maintain due weight in the article? 2. Should the senior leadership names be included, considering sourcing, notability, and accountability under WP:BLP? 3. Does the proposed summary appropriately reflect the incident’s coverage and significance, while remaining proportional in length? HonestHarbor (talk) 17:43, 8 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia policies and guidelines
[edit]Talk:Women Against State Pension Inequality
| Is the inclusion of a standalone “Criticism” section in this article consistent with WP:UNDUE?
The article concerns a pressure group. A separate “Criticism” section has been added, sourced to several newspaper articles critical of the group. There are currently no positive or neutral sources presented, and the section summarises criticism without clear evidence that such criticism constitutes a major or defining aspect of the group’s overall coverage. Velvetfreak (talk) 16:58, 2 February 2026 (UTC) |
| Should we include cities where Waymo has announced future expansion, but hasn't actually started service yet?
Arguments in favor of inclusion:
Argument against inclusion: (@Graywalls: feel free to add more here) Numberguy6 (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2026 (UTC) |
Talk:Proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery
| I am initiating this Request for Comment (RfC) to seek input from experienced editors and administrators regarding persistent policy compliance issues in this article, which covers a high-profile proposed acquisition involving Warner Bros. Discovery.
Despite repeated editing and cleanup efforts, the article continues to exhibit systemic problems that significantly undermine its encyclopedic quality and neutrality. Key Issues Requiring Community Review
Prior Cleanup Efforts I have personally conducted substantial editing, including:
However, these efforts have not resolved the underlying issues, suggesting that individual edits alone are insufficient and that broader consensus and oversight are required. Questions for Comment I respectfully request community input on the following:
Closing Given the prominence of this topic and the likelihood of continued drive-by or promotional editing, this article requires careful scrutiny by experienced contributors. The goal of this RfC is to establish clear consensus on how the article should be structured, weighted, and maintained in line with Wikipedia’s core content policies. Administrator and senior editor input is especially welcomed.
|
| I am requesting wider community input regarding multiple sourcing and accuracy issues in this article.
A detailed breakdown of the problems has been provided above on this talk page, but in summary the concerns include:
Several of these issues originate from a series of edits by one contributor, and despite partial later corrections, many problematic statements and citations remain in the article. I would appreciate independent evaluation of whether the current content meets Wikipedia’s standards for verifiability, accurate use of sources, and reliable sourcing, and guidance on how these sections should be corrected. Thank you for your time and input. Аксамит (talk) 19:37, 30 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
| Should WP:Closing discussions be made a guideline? Aaron Liu (talk) 17:22, 26 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:General disclaimer
| WP:DISCLAIMER now redirects to Category:Wikipedia disclaimers. There are currently six disclaimer pages ("Before"). Should they be replaced with one page, as proposed in the "After" section, and any redirects to the category or these pages go to the "After" version?
Before:
After: I asked editors at the idea lab to comment about the change, and posted an additional invitation to the talk page of the General disclaimer, but I didn't get much feedback. Szmenderowiecki (talk · contribs) 16:46, 24 January 2026 (UTC) |
Template talk:Infobox Australian place
Should Template:Infobox Australian place be updated to support the aliases |first_nations_name= and |indigenous_name= for the existing |native_name= parameter? Poketama (talk) 22:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| This Request for Comment seeks community input on whether the current article framing accurately reflects what reliable sources explicitly establish.
Specifically: – Do the cited sources explicitly and consistently support presenting the events as “genocide”, including casualty figures and inferred intent, as settled facts without attribution? – Or should these elements be more carefully attributed or contextualized in line with WP:V, WP:SYNTH, WP:UNDUE, and WP:LABEL? |
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists - sourcing requirements
| What sourcing standards should be applied to airport destination lists? 10:59, 19 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/RfC LLMCOMM guideline
| Should the proposed guideline at User:Athanelar/Don't use LLMs to talk for you be accepted?
Please see the collapsed sections above for the pre-RfC workshopping and discussion of the topic. Please indicate whether you Support or Oppose the proposed guideline and why. Athanelar (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films)
Should the provision at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films)#Upcoming films regarding considering recent pageviews to retain redirects with titles ending with the disambiguator "(upcoming film)" be adjusted, removed, not changed, or something else? Steel1943 (talk) 22:33, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| :The information in this section is not based on verifiable fact and related to a living person. The investigation conducted by Canada Soccer can be found here. The investigation does not conclude what is being alleged in this article. See: https://news.canadasoccer.com/canada-soccer-releases-findings-of-independent-investigation-organizational-change-continues Anonymous sources and accusations re not sufficient for a living person biography. This section does not meet Wikipedia standards. AnnWinterburne (talk) 03:11, 11 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Image use policy
| One of the valid uses of AI-generated imagery in articlespace is to illustrate AI-related topics and notable AI-generated images. For these cases, should we modify the policy to indicate a preference for images used by reliable sources (assuming there are no licensing concerns)? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:06, 9 January 2026 (UTC) |
Should the following be adopted as a guideline for using LLM-assisted machine translation tools?
Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 10:39, 6 January 2026 (UTC) |
Talk:Ukraine and weapons of mass destruction
| May an attributed, reliably sourced paragraph documenting a state leader’s stated perception or justification be included in an article without requiring mandatory inline “debunking” or editorial judgments about the leader’s sincerity or intent? User-FR-123 (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2026 (UTC) |
WikiProjects and collaborations
[edit]Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League
| Should NFL conference championship games be notable enough for their own articles? ~2026-37153-4 (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia technical issues and templates
[edit]Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Olympics
| Starting an RfC on the placement of Template:2026 Winter Olympics and Template:2024 Summer Olympics (and all similar templates) across main Olympic Games articles such as 2026 Winter Olympics and 2024 Summer Olympics.
Until earlier this month, these templates have been located directly below the infobox, usually within the introduction. As their recent removal, appears to impact navigability to other related articles such as 2024 Summer Olympics Parade of Nations. Open to suggestions on if they should be re-added as before, relocated elsewhere within the main article, or completely removed. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 21:39, 27 January 2026 (UTC) |
Talk:Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
How should we format his place of birth in the infobox?
Thedarkknightli (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia proposals
[edit]Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Merging merge discussions with AfD
| Should the proposed article merge process be merged into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion? 18:24, 19 January 2026 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
 to celebrate wikipedia's 25th anniversary, a toggleable "birthday mode" has been created. it consists of easter eggs involving baby globe, such as having it scroll a phone in the top right of an article while the reader scrolls down an article. more details can be found on the linked page. if the feature is enabled, by 26 january, administrators can configure the mode through community configuration; and the mode will be public from 16 february to 16 march (an administrator will have to turn on the feature on the day itself). enabling the feature requires "a consensus from your community", so i have brought it here to ascertain the community consensus. (there was some previous discussion on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 86 § Easter eggs, but it was archived without further action.) should english wikipedia enable the 25th anniversary birthday mode, and if so, should it be on by default?
voting (25th anniversary birthday mode) |
Unsorted
[edit]
User names
[edit]
|
Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators • |
This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Wikipedia's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:
- Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention.
- For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; blatant vandalism can also be reported at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is sometimes a better option.
Do NOT post here if:
- the user in question has made no recent edits.
- you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also Wikipedia:Blocking policy § Unblocking).
Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:
- has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
- has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
- is not already blocked.
If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Wikipedia's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.
Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.
Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList
Reports
[edit]Please remember that this is not a vote, rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion.
- Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.