Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters

Note: this page is automatically archived using YiFeiBot_2; completed requests are archived after 24 hours. Manual archiving is normally unnecessary. Please check and fix incorrect codes, missing timestamps, etc. For more information, please see the bot request page. – Baffle gab1978 (talk)

Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • Unless the temporary account has done significant work on the article, drive-by requests by unregistered editors may be declined at any time.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:



January 2026

[edit]

Would like to copyedit this article because this is a significant importance related to the 2026 United States strikes in Venezuela and considering to nominate to DYK in a matter of days once its ready. cyrfaw (talk) 10:21, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyfraw The article is undergoing rapid development right now, which probably makes it unsuitable for copyediting (since the copyedited prose would be quickly overwritten anyway). It might be best to wait until the content is stable. Crestfalling (talk/contribs) 23:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The article has had 25 edits in the last 24 hours. We usually put unstable article requests like this on hold to see if they settle down before they reach the top of the queue, or decline them without prejudice to a future copy-editing request when the article stabilizes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

() On hold per above; discuss at REQ talk. 🅑🅐🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅰🅱 18:51, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the edits have slowed down now. Kingsacrificer (talk) 13:56, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

() no Declined per talk page discussion – this article is still unstable (though yes, slightly less so); it's still an active news story and still has several maintenance templates, so a copy-edit now would probably be quickly wiped out. Discuss this at REQ talk. Cheers, 🅑🅰🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅐🅱 04:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to submit this to BCN or GAN, though I'm struggling with organizing the reception properly, given its current form. I considered starting from scratch, but I'm afraid it would take some time for me. A basic copy-edit (organizing review sentences into paragraphs) would do, I can continue doing WP:CRS as I find more sources published just after the US theatrical release.RFNirmala (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Been working on this for a bit, but I'd appreciate some PR. If you like promotional removal, this one is for you! Haha. Thanks, BrotherGunk (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An old game article expanded some years ago.Tintor2 (talk) 19:14, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

One of the most important and fascinating figures of the Serbian Middle Ages, Lazarević was both a great warrior, knight and a poet. Soon after his demise, the country fell under Ottoman rule for the next 350 years. Regarding the issues found in the article, to quote another editor: “It’s too descriptive, and the English vocabulary isn’t very precise throughout the whole article, leading to some inaccurate conclusions.” Thanks. — Sadko (words are wind) 22:19, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

working Crystalite13 (talk) 06:02, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

For an GAN Olliefant (she/her) 02:47, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

For an GAN Olliefant (she/her) 02:47, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in need of very in-depth copyediting. Thank you. OceanHok (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

icon Working Crystalite13 (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
did some work, not much needed Crystalite13 (talk) 05:44, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Did copy-editing myself before submitting to GAN, but I fear my CE is not good enough for the standards of the FA Criteria. Much help would be appreciated :) 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 09:51, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Still just looking to do a GAN but a new section has been added since the last copyedit so I want to make sure everything is up to snuff. Also, second opinions can never hurt. Thanks, feedmepaperr (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

February 2026

[edit]

2017 FA and may run TFA in April. Has issues with flow and grammar and could use a copyedit by an outside group. Harizotoh9 (talk) 13:47, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An old character article I created some years ago. A fellow user expanded it some time later but I believed it needs a copyedit before any nomination.Tintor2 (talk) 22:50, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Going to submit this as a GAN, needs some copyediting before it can be nominated. RedShellMomentum 23:44, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Might need some copyedits. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 23:54, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There are plans to make this page a GA (via a GAN) or an FA (via an FAC) at some point in the future. sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:26, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Old FA, may run at TFA. Positively ancient and needs a copyedit. Harizotoh9 (talk) 19:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]