Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- Kirloskar brand (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:16, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Warned user. Level 3. Daniel Case (talk) 22:58, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Jpw3man (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 766 twice in the last 5 minutes (Alt-right labeling, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. I have also explained to them how to cite sources Daniel Case (talk) 23:03, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-73720-1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Warned user. Level 2 Daniel Case (talk) 23:06, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-73919-8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:50, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-73722-7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Duhloser (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-73624-5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-74792-9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:23, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-74873-9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:02, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-74424-8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1174 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1174, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- GOOGLEGEMI (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 139 (Fixed position vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:42, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-74484-1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 766 twice in the last 5 minutes (Alt-right labeling, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:13, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Infinitywiki2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1376 three times in the last 60 minutes (Unusual edit count activity, details). Note: This filter has some false positives. Use caution before taking any actions. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:52, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- ~2026-69316-5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) User:Bertrand101 made another vandalism, using an IP address without signing in, inserting his hoax about Audiovisual Communicators acquiring DWBC 1422 even that station already inactive for years, and DWBC-AM as well.
- Samyarsedaghatpour (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Repeated disruptive edits, abuse filter log also indicates they are not here to contribute constructively. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 07:30, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- PhosphoricSheep (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Apparently revived vandalism-only account from 5 years ago. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 07:49, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-74195-2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) vandalizes the El-Issa family article and distorts its meaning.
- EstonianBiden (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:20, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:20, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 02:20, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Larpiss (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Up up down down left right left right A B start (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Commiebiogirl (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Barf lace (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "barf" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:30, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Davifc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- ХРИСССКА (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- Vaseline.Lip.therapy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) &ndash: Promotional username, the name of a product Atlantic306 (talk) 23:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Atlantic306, have any of their edits promoted Vaseline? Cullen328 (talk) 04:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Accessibility auditing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Impersonation. Stockhausenfan (talk) 00:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Fat25faget (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 05:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Whitelabeldm11 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (whitelabeldm.com). See Special:Diff/1336352083. Annh07 (talk) 08:14, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- WeAreGhostHug (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 08:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Engrish-speaking Japanese (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Appears to be an offensive username. Engrish is the use of broken English because one does not know the language well, so it can be taken as making fun of Japanese people who cannot speak English properly. I can't really think of any "above-board" reason for such a name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:23, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Temporary semi-protection: Some edit conflicts, as well as attempts to introduce unsourced material due to recent media attention. Two pieces of toast (talk) 13:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Temp account edits are 50/50 postive/disruptive...overall I think the little disruption there is is well handled by "normal" editing. Lectonar (talk) 09:30, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – TAs repeatedly changing dates and removing mention that it's a French coproduction w/o explanation. DonIago (talk) 14:36, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. last disruptive edit was about 3 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 09:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Over the last several months, it's been targeted by multiple accounts (temporary and registered alike) devoted to adding the same set of unsourced material. The first page of the history is already pretty much clogged up with the inappropriate edits and their consequent reverts. Victor Lopes Fala!•C 14:55, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of well-referenced content by IP editor. Previous edits by registered user(s) with CoI. Tacyarg (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: ~2026-52608-1 (talk · contribs). The Bushranger One ping only 07:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced and false material by anonymous users. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 15:34, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: underlying IP (talk · contribs). Long history of disruptive edits, all reverted; blocked for three months. - The Bushranger One ping only 07:33, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:51, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: A couple of different IP editors are persistently adding the same unsourced content about non-notable people. Biruitorul Talk 17:14, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sugar Tax (talk) 18:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered user making non-constructive edits across multiple TAs. Super Dinosaur (TV series) may also be worth protecting, though they've only targeted that page once so far. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 19:00, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:02, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:16, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level of disruptive editing, changing the version number based on original research. EvanTech10 (talk) 23:12, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: 3 incidents of temporary accounts vandalising the page in the past day: [1] [2] [3] The subject has had increased attention on social media and online misinformation, see AP News article Pretzel Quetzal (talk) 00:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 01:39, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of well-referenced content by multiple IP editors. Carwil (talk) 02:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: New accounts have been consistently changing the names of school directors kongr43gpenTalk 03:14, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Think 2 weeks has to be an error here - it was vandalized immediately after a two year protection, when back then it was vandalized after a five-year protection from 2019-2024, and before that multiple short-term protections in 2018, and three-year protections from 2014-2017 and before that from 2012-2014. Article has essentially been protected continuously for 14 years, with further extensions dating majority protection back to 2006 looking at the protection log, indefinite semi seems kinda necessary at this point. (Note:Request is intended for indefinite semi-protection though it intentionally states it is for ECP only so it doesn't get quickly bot-clerked.). MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 03:52, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: An editor continues to remove a declared candidate from the page while lying in their edit summaries. I do a bit of googling and find out that the editor has the same username as a woman who tried to unsuccessfully sue the candidate to try regain possession of a property they had sold. If anyone needs to verify this I can give them the links privately but I thought it best not to air it out with names here. Page protection aside, any recommendations as to where to report this behaviour? It doesn't really fit one particular mold. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 04:28, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Recently article protected. After its been unlocked, same Ip users are adding the unreferenced names for directors and executive producers.[4][5][6] Hotwiki (talk) 05:52, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism turning into vandalism by new account ~ JASWE (talk) 06:45, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Recurring sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yaysmay15 as soon as protection against them was lifted. A long-term lock is necessary as they will sock the moment protection is lifted. Borgenland (talk) 07:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued spam by temporary accounts. Mellk (talk) 07:48, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Covered by WP:CT/IMH (which is broadly construed), with repeated edits by new accounts going back quite a while, especially as they relate to the Insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir, an ECP is required for ARBCOM enforcement. Gotitbro (talk) 08:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent–and sometimes hostile–vandalism of a BLP. Poirot09 (talk) 08:25, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sugar Tax (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Anarchyte (talk) 11:03, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sugar Tax (talk) 10:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 11:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sugar Tax (talk) 10:53, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Very important page Charles 091 (talk) 10:55, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Laura240406 (talk) 11:19, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive additions by a TA. I'm involved so can take no action (nor am I prepared to edit-war with an IP). A short block might work too. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:19, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
- ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
- If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
- If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
- ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.
You may request a protection reduction below if...
- ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
- ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
Inaccuracy in timeline / sources.
Current: "Musk has described Epstein as a creep who had tried to get him to go to his island several times but that he had rebuked him each time, email were exchanged between between 2012 and 2013. [citations]"
Suggested change: "In 2019, Musk described Epstein as a creep who had invited him to his island multiple times, which he had declined. [new citation] Emails between Musk and Epstein were exchanged between 2012 and 2013 [existing citations]".
[new citation] = https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/07/jeffrey-epstein-case-grows-more-grotesque Wrongseasoned (talk) 13:32, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 07:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
| 3 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:06, 2 February 2026 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I have been editing for several years now, have close to 89,000 edits, and have new page patrol which I regularly patrol new pages with. I also am a regular in AfD discussions, but I also make new pages, though less frequently than my other activities. I think my new articles pass the requirements of GNG and other guidelines in order to pass the patrol/review process. I've made at least 27 articles in the mainspace, and thousands of others which do not count for this (redirects or disambiguation). Ping me if there are any other questions. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 01:33, 27 January 2026 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) @Iljhgtn's most recent articles are for publications, such as books. Checks of those articles didn't raise any red flags. A minor note about AG1 (company), is that WP:FORBESCON is not considered reliable. Articles on companies, as I'm sure @Iljhgtn will know as a fellow reviewer, are notoriously challenging to write in a manner that doesn't come across as WP:PROMO. I didn't come across this in the AG1 article, which is reassuring. I will remain neutral, but I think @Iljhgtn can be trusted with AP. Thank you for your contributions! 11WB (talk) 02:01, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Cypp0847 has authored 198 articles, of which only 2 have been deleted. One of these was for WP:SYNTH, the AfD having taken place during October 2022. They primarily translate articles from the Chinese Wikipedia, recent examples contain no issues that require action by an NPR. I reviewed Ma Tau Wai Road building collapse and found no issues, other than adding the translation banner to the talk page. Chinese sources vary in reliability, but based on the articles I have reviewed from @Cypp0847, the sourcing appears consistent and without issue. BLPs such as John Clancey are well sourced and do not leave any information uncited. A recent AfD of their article John MacLennan resulted in a unanimous keep. Their talk page is mostly filled with automated messages regarding images, with little after April 2025. Based on what I've seen from @Cypp0847, I am quite confident the 2022 AfD SYNTH concerns were an anomaly, and doesn't appear to have been an ongoing issue, with no reoccurrences since. Thank you for your contributions and translations, @Cypp0847! 11WB (talk) 10:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed |
| Requests for event coordinator |
|---|
Event coordinator
I will be on-site coordinator for Wikimedia Community Ireland events going forward. Will use the Programs and Events Dashboard but this will be a fall-back Geichel (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
I am an instructor using Wikipedia Education in my classes. Some students have issues making accounts. Being able to make accounts for them is helping a lot. Anuinhawaii (talk) 19:50, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I've created a number of articles, and wanted the opportunity to give something back by reviewing new pages from time to time. I was on the NPP for a month: I think I'm starting to gain confidence in this area, and would welcome the chance to learn more by extending my permission. ArthurTheGardener (talk) 15:29, 1 February 2026 (UTC) ArthurTheGardener (talk) 15:29, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to help out with new page backlog. @HJ Mitchell: Per your feedback, I've been contributing to AfD the last several weeks. Do you think I'm ready to review new pages? Other feedback for my contributions? Or too soon still? |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Aakashnavindu (talk) 09:43, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Good day, I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights as I regularly clear vandalism and warn users appropriately, and ensure edits meet Wikipedia's sourcing standards. I have been using Ultraviolet/RedWarn to do so, and would like Pending changes reviewer rights to help review edits on vandalism-prone pages. Thank you for your time and consideration. Aakashnavindu (talk) 09:43, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I've been RC patrolling for far beyond a month, have over 300 edits, and access to rollback (and the tools it allows usage of) would be quite helpful in my patrol. MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 03:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights because I have recent experience of manually rolling back unconstructive edits in the iOS articles, and the rollback permission would be useful. I have over 500 edits. EvanTech10 (talk) 17:15, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting the rollback right mainly to gain access to tools such as AntiVandal and Huggle so that I can revert vandalism much faster. I have been patrolling recent changes for about 6 months and almost all of my mainspace edits are antivandalism or recent changes related. Thank you.
I have been a RCP for about 5 months now and can easily distinguish between constructive edits and vandalism or other disruptive edits. I think having rollback permissions will be useful for me as I also have plans on running other scripts in the future such as WikiShield, which requires rollback perms to run it. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 20:41, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
Hi! I'm requesting an extension to my currently-granted template editor rights, as I'm about a week out from my trial expiring. My original request was made here and granted at Special:PermaLink/1323646684#User:MikeVitale as a trial until the end of January. During this time, I've had User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable open as a tab, and used it to find and fulfill multiple template edit requests from other editors. Pinging @User:Sohom_Datta who granted my initial trial. MikeVitale 00:44, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
So I have a slightly unusual request. Right as I was recommended by Zackmann08 to apply for this permission, it was bestowed upon me by theleekycauldron so I could do DYK work (thank you, leeky). However, I think a review of my technical contributions is warranted to confirm whether I should be using this permission outside of DYK-space. I believe I meet all of the usual criteria, but if there's a preference that I gain more experience before editing templates independently, I will respect that and refrain from making changes through template protection. I've read through the guideline for this permission and will follow it in good faith to the best of my ability, and will exercise the high degree of caution expected in this area. I would also welcome any feedback about my previous template work — I'm always happy to learn more about it. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:36, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
My work as a new page reviewer and in recent changes (mainly watched pages), especially in talk page conversations, is sometimes made more difficult when having to deal with users editing from the same IP with different temporary accounts. This permission could also make it easier to identify socking in the rare occasion I have to submit SPI reports. -- Reconrabbit 06:19, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
|
.svg/60px-Test_Template_Info-Icon_-_Version_(2).svg.png){kind=icon}
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}{{#if:{{{showtaiv|}}}|
{{!}} showtaiv {{=}} {{{showtaiv}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time. | String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show temporary account IP viewer | showtaiv | Allows hiding the requests for temporary account IP viewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |