Wikipedia:XfD today

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscernible Unsorted

< February 02	February 04 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Still Motion (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has only one source (Wikipedia:Articles with a single source) which is referencing the band's YouTube channel. The rest are external links, those being their MySpace profile and their webpage, all of which are dead links. All three of these sources are primary which is not a good idea to use per WP:PRIMARY and WP:PSTS.

Even if the band does exist, there has been very little, if any secondary reporting on their actions. Qwerty123M (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Qwerty123M (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Karanveer Khullar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor, lack of SIGCOV and Significant roles. Zuck28 (talk) 10:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, India, Haryana, and Punjab. Zuck28 (talk) 10:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

1977 Vlog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is devoid of any reliable sources. Available coverage such as this article are an interview with the creators, and is thus WP:PRIMARY. I'm not seeing any evidence of independent coverage. 11WB (talk) 10:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, News media, and Vietnam. 11WB (talk) 10:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Maxym

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been entirely unreferenced since 2007, suggesting that it does not pass WP:SIGCOV I also can't find any evidence to suggest that it is sufficiently notable under WP:CREATIVE Two pieces of toast (talk) 10:08, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 10:59, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Matuail Adarsha High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG. I couldn't find any sources that provide significant coverage. — Raihanur (talk) 09:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. — Raihanur (talk) 09:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Telangana Gaddar Film Award for Best Feature Film

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Useless WP:CFORK. Sources do not cover the individual award, only name it with winners of the overall award show. On its face it appears to have been an award given out since 2014. In reality, the award was given at Telangana Gaddar Film Awards of 2024, a one-time event where they presented awards for numerous years. The 2024 show is also a useless CFORK of Telangana Gaddar Film Awards which closed as no consensus at an AfD last year. CNMall41 (talk) 06:52, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Awards, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 06:54, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are multiple sources which cover the individual Best Film Award The Hindu, SouthFirst, The New Indian Express, separately from 2025 event. Telangana Gaddar Film Awards of 2024 covers the awards exclusively for the films released in 2024, so Best Film winners from 2014 is outside the scope of that article.

It is an official state award on the lines of National Film Awards, Tamil Nadu State Film Awards, etc. The Government of Telangana has invited films for 2025 in Jan 2026, so it's not a one-time event as claimed. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:04, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering if LLM was involved in your search as the first two sources you linked to do not mention the award at all, just the show. The third only states the name of who won that specific award, not significant coverage about the category itself.--CNMall41 (talk) 07:07, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No LLM involved. But I've fixed SouthFirst's link. The show took place on 16 June 2025, and these sources are from 30-31 May. Sources such as Chitrajyothi (Andhra Jyothi) give significant coverage in the form of background and jury members who selected the winners, along with the list of winners. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:18, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Noting this. Once a comment is made based on links you provided, it would be better to strike any link you want to replace as it makes it seem like I did not look at your comment. As far as the link you changed it to, it is a simple list of winners for the award (that were given at a SINGLE event, not MULTIPLE years, and is based on churnalism - no byline "South First Desk" which indicates WP:NEWSORGINDIA). In fact, it is based on this churnalism which clearly states, "the TFDC had announced the complete list of winners..." Also, a list of winners is not significant coverage. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Chitrayjothi source is also churnalism.--CNMall41 (talk) 07:20, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, this list is a WP:OKFORK for the main page which is notable, has encyclopedic value and prevents the clutter in the main page which covers Awards a whole, rather than a single category. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:41, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Which page? There is the main event page and then the single year event.--CNMall41 (talk) 07:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per Ab207. A reasonable Wikipedia:SPLITLIST and/or WP:OKFORK. Lists that have a navigation/information purpose are generally kept, regardless of notability..--~2026-47538-0 (talk) 10:54, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

How would having navigation for a single category for an award that was only given out one year be helpful to readers? It currently serves as an WP:INDISCRIMINATE list of award winners given in 2024 for a single category. Wikipedia is basically serving as churnalism and promotional tool for the show. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Most main awards at national/state level film awards ceremonies (and best feature is probably the clearest example of that) have their page and it obviously offers information and helps navigate. Indiscriminate, how? It lists only verified awardees. How could that possibly be considered indiscriminate? Promotion and churnalism, how? I honestly do not understand what your concern is. ~2026-47538-0 (talk) 21:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I realize you may "not understand what [my] concern is" but I have stated it in my nomination and in the above thread so I will not attempt to WP:SATISFY at this point, especially since you have presented an other stuff exists argument which is an argument to avoid. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:07, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I see you changed the link prior to my response so I will ask, "which awards in that category of 182 awards has had only one event?" If you are saying that any award that has that category is inherently notable. It is not. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:09, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I did not change any link, I just inserted a category (belatedly and then fixed it) to show you what kind of navigation trees can be used. That was while you were replying, maybe, yes, but not sure about what you mean (prior to?). For the rest, I don’t think your question nor the essay you link is related to the main point in my vote so I won’t reply any further. Don’t ”satisfy”, sure, no problem. Have an excellent day. ~2026-47538-0 (talk) 22:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:59, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's fair to call it "INDISCRIMINATE." The list specifically contains only the films which won the highest film award in the state they are produced. It is strictly 3 films (first, second and third) each year, no more, no less. It hardly matters when they are announced together or at once. It's fairly common for Indian states to announced awards of 2-3 years at once because Governments have other things to do too. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. The mentioned rationale is quite clear. I won't dive into the source analysis, since the above discussion has already detailed it out. Retro music11 (talk) 00:43, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes Wp:NEVENT and GNG. Zuck28 (talk) 02:47, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

NEVENT is not about concerts, award shows, etc. See WP:NCONCERT which isn't covered under EVENT. This would need to meet WP:GNG. Either way, the coverage is not significant. Can you point out the significant coverage that isn't churnalism? --CNMall41 (talk) 04:34, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

1: not churnalism, 2: not churnalism, 3: not churnalism, 4: not churnalism and 5: No WP:CHURNALISM. Zuck28 (talk) 13:22, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The very first source you linked to says "In a press conference.....unveiled a retrospective list...." (my emphasis) which is clearly churnalism. They took an announcement and reprinted it. It's routine. Not significant. No independent thought. And....the same information was within a day of several others with the same information including here, here, and here. Notability is NOT based on press announcements. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:13, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, the first four you linked are all coming from the announcement. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:14, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The keep !votes have quite a range of rationales. It would be ideal if during the relist period contributors might focus on (1) whether the sources cited above are sufficiently reliable – perhaps a source analysis table might help? – and (2) whether this award has independent notability or could be dealt with adequately in Telangana Gaddar Film Awards of 2024.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 09:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kashipur High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. I could not find any reliable source either. — Raihanur (talk) 09:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. — Raihanur (talk) 09:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Gourav Vallabh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable politician with no elected seats or positions. Sources are mostly NEWSORGINDIA and Godi Media. Clearly fails WP:NPOL Zuck28 (talk) 09:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, India, Delhi, Jharkhand, and Rajasthan. Zuck28 (talk) 09:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

2024–25 Amateur National

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, has been moved to draft and republished with no improvements Mariamnei (talk) 09:16, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Morocco. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Guinea–Lithuania relations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no actual bilateral relations between these countries except diplomatic recognition. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 09:10, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Africa, and Lithuania. LibStar (talk) 09:10, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ruchira Chaudhary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see a pass of WP:BIO - sources largely comprise interviews, or articles written by the subject, so WP:GNG isn't met. Book reviews are OK, but one reasonably well-reviewed book does not meet the bar of WP:NAUTHOR. And I don't see that WP:NPROF is achieved either. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Singapore, and India. SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Parker West

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO Ingratis (talk) 08:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC) I don't see any notability either as a cheerleader, a dancer or a gay man. Ingratis (talk) 11:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of LGBTQ+ studies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The comment below relates to the AfD for Vismaya Mohanlal - I can't see how to move it, so if sks would oblige...

Keep – The subject meets the General Notability Guideline (WP:GNG) through significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable secondary sources.

Vismaya Mohanlal is an author with a published book (Grains of Stardust, 2021) that has received independent coverage from reliable outlets such as *The Hindu*, *The Times of India*, *Mathrubhumi*, and *Gulf News*. These sources discuss her work and artistic pursuits beyond her familial relationship.

Additionally, her upcoming acting debut in Thudakkam has been covered by multiple independent reliable sources, indicating sustained public and media interest. The article can be further improved with additional citations, but deletion would be premature given the existing coverage. Aju88 (talk) 09:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep''' – The subject meets the General Notability Guideline (WP:GNG) through significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable secondary sources.

Vismaya Mohanlal has received substantial independent coverage for her literary work. Her poetry collection ''Grains of Stardust'' (2021) has been discussed in detail by reliable national and regional publications including *The Times of India*, *The New Indian Express*, *Mathrubhumi*, and *The News Minute*. These are independent sources that focus on her writing, artistic voice, and creative identity, not merely her familial association.

Examples of such coverage include:

• *The Times of India* article reviewing and contextualising her book (2021).

• *The New Indian Express* feature article titled “Stories of Stardust” (2021).

• *Mathrubhumi* and *The News Minute* articles covering her work as an author and poet.

Additionally, her transition into cinema and upcoming acting debut have also been reported by independent media, indicating sustained public and media interest beyond a single event.

While the article can be further improved with expanded sourcing and prose, the available coverage already satisfies WP:GNG. Deletion at this stage would therefore be premature. ~~~~ Aju88 (talk) 09:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Vismaya Mohanlal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:BIO. Lacks depth of coverage in independent sources, most are trivial in relation to subjects father. That person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A (unless significant coverage can be found on A); relationships do not confer notability. However, person A may be included in the related article on B. As per WP:INVALIDBIO Prowithapen (talk) 07:46, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:39, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The sources (e.g., Onmanorama, The Hindu) are reliable and independent, but most coverage written news agencies not authored and focuses on her as the daughter of a notable individual rather than providing significant standalone coverage. I am not !voting at this stage. EditCivitas (talk) 08:51, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Wp:PROMO, and WP:NENTERTAINER, simple case of WP:TOOSOON. Maybe later they can pass GNG. Zuck28 (talk) 09:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mukesh Harane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely LLM; also WP:BLP1E Kora ^^ (she/her) ^{say hi!}/_{what I've done} 01:38, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Kora ^^ (she/her) ^{say hi!}/_{what I've done} 01:38, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Advertising. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:20, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Smoking in India#Advertising, maybe merge some relevant content. It is a 1E, but it has some continued coverage. But I don't think it should be covered separately from the main article. Kelob2678 (talk) 10:35, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:45, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lü Guang's invasion of Western Qin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most content in this article is unverifiable. Suggest draftifying to allow for improvement. Mccapra (talk) 00:35, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and China. Mccapra (talk) 00:35, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:22, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with the draftify proposal. Trumpetrep (talk) 02:56, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:45, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Old Hickory Lake Arboretum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:GNG. Suggest redirecting to List of botanical gardens and arboretums in the United States per WP:ATD.4meter4 (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:23, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: List of botanical gardens and arboretums in the United States is a list of lists, only listing the state (and territory, etc.)–level lists of botanical gardens and arboretums. The correct target would be List of botanical gardens and arboretums in Tennessee, though I have to wonder if that (and the other similar lists) are intended to be ones that only list the ones with articles. (I have no opinion beyond the ATD-R target clarification.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:25, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input. I agree with the corrected target.4meter4 (talk) 03:31, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I did manage to find a single reference from a local news site, however it is essentially the only vaguely reliable source I can see online for the article, and contains little information, so the article likely still fails WP:GNG. Two pieces of toast (talk) 09:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Selig

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not pass WP:GNG, either as a playwright or as a psychic. The Nightline source is the only one approaching WP:SIGCOV. The remaining sources are not about the subject and do not contribute to notability. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 03:22, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject is notable and has a number of reliable sources. Eric Carpenter (talk) 03:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
1. New York Magazine article is not SIGCOV.
2. NY Times review is about the subject's work, and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED, and even then the play is not notable.
3. Forbes source is WP:FORBESCON.
David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 03:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Theatre, Paranormal, Connecticut, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Has a check been done for if he passes WP:NAUTHOR? PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

~~I'm comfortable that he does not meet WP:NAUTHOR.~~ David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 06:30, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at newspapers.com and proquest I am pretty sure he does based on having multiple works that themself received reviews. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:CREATIVE, for them notability is inherited. His notable works include Terminal Bar and Mystery School[1][2] Kelob2678 (talk) 10:28, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The guideline is not as straight forward as "notability is inherited," requiring a significant or well-known work. I agree that the two plays are notable themselves but it's not obvious that these two plays are significant enough for him to pass NCREATIVE. —BrechtBro (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He passes NAUTHOR-3 for creating the notable play Terminal Bar (play). 5Q5|^✉ 17:52, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Terminal Bar (play). I think keeping the article encourages weighting problems, since he appears to be notable only for the two plays mentioned by @Kelob2678. As there's no article on Mystery School (the less-notable of the two), merging to an author section to the article on Terminal Bar is adequate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrechtBro (talk • contribs) 08:09, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I was considering withdrawing this because a deeper search into old newspapers (should have done that in my WP:BEFORE, though I didn't have newspapers.com access) found more sources related to some of his plays. However I am still not convinced the plays are particularly notable, at least enough for inheritance. The test for WP:NAUTHOR inheritance is that the work is itself significant, and that it has itself had multiple independent reviews. I'm not convinced these plays are significant. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 19:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Significant here means notable for WP:NAUTHOR. A book or play can be notable without ever receiving reviews, which would not translate to author notability, that is why it says and (so you don't get technical author notability from cases where the book got no coverage, like if it won an award or is a very prominent textbook) How else are we going to determine significance? Are you suggesting that if one review (the only review a book ever got) calls a work "significant", this is better evidence of it being "significant" than the book receiving dozens of reviews (Not this case but I am giving an example)? PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:42, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think you've misunderstood me. My reading of the guideline is that for an author to inherit notability from a work, their work needs to be significant, which is to say more than merely notable. The term the guideline uses is "significant or well-known work". A play with a brief tour and some reviews might be notable, but it is not significant. To me significance implies the play should have been very widely acclaimed, or it otherwise can be verified that it is of particularly high quality.

It seems wrong to me that the author of a play that itself only barely meets WP:GNG would be automatically notable enough for their own article, just because their play got a couple of routine reviews. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 20:23, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Judging "significance" in this manner is wholly arbitrary, the only usage of it onwiki is in the context of notability. We do not judge notability based on how good or bad we think something is, at all. And reviews are inherently not WP:ROUTINE, they are not any of the things listed there. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:11, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@PARAKANYAA: and @Cloventt: Generally we interpret criteria 3 and 4C of WP:NCREATIVE as having multiple independent critical reviews of substance in by-lined publications of multiple works (ie more than one work created by a subject). Sometimes people will discount local coverage, but in this case we have national magazines and newspapers covering productions, so that isn't an issue. I found a Los Angeles Times piece verifying Solig won a Drama League Award in 1988 for The Pompeii Traveling Show, and added a Playbill article on him. That award win clearly demonstrates criteria 4c is met, and also shows that Terminal Bar is not his only notable play. Best.4meter4 (talk) 07:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to close this as weak keep but the more I looked at both articles, I think the correct move here is to merge to Terminal Bar (play). Both articles are in a sad state and if ever the notability of the author or there's more information, it can be split off; as it stands now, I don't think there's sufficient notability or information to warrant a standalone article for the author. I think this would be a fair compromise. Mkdw ^talk 04:49, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has lots of critical reviews for multiple stage works in both regional and national publications. Winner of a Drama League Award in 1988 (I added a Los Angeles Times source for the award win, and several more critical reviews). Passes WP:NCREATIVE 4c.4meter4 (talk) 06:55, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think the arguments presented above should result in this being resolved as a keep. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 08:10, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The subject meets WP:NCREATIVE (4c) with multiple independent critical reviews of more than one stage work and a Drama League Award win. Notability is established; a merge is unnecessary.EditCivitas (talk) 08:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nurole

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication that this passes WP:NCORP. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Most sources are WP:CORPTRIV or primary / WP:DEPENDENTCOVERAGE. Prowithapen (talk) 07:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Internet, United Kingdom, and England. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 07:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pequeños Gigantes (Colombian TV series)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 06:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 06:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Article does not meet WP:GNG and a quick look at google yields minimal results. If there's not been any sources since 2006, its not likely any substantial ones will be added in the future. Viatori (talk) 08:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Orient Paper Mills

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of a non notable subsidiary of a notable organisation. Fails Wp:ORGDEPTH. Zuck28 (talk) 01:38, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Madhya Pradesh. Zuck28 (talk) 01:38, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Casino.org

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources in the article do not meet the standard for in-depth coverage for corporations. I could not find other sources. —🌊PacificDepths (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —🌊PacificDepths (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. There are recent citations from The Las Vegas Review Journal and The Guinness World Record official website, both talking specifically about their research and World Record accomplishments. A quick search on Google for sources shows the business cited on New York Post, CBS, The Street and Fox. I see https://www.casino.org/news/ referenced a lot too. So it's probably just a case of finding more sources than a case for deletion? Hbrennan91 (talk) 09:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Escape (recording studio)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As outlined on the article's talk page, the article fails the requirements of WP:NCOMPANY / WP:GNG. Most of the cited references are primary sources, such as the company's website, and are not independent, or they don't specifically mention Escape Studios. They only refer to Rancho V and Skyline Studio. The article's creator has argued that they are one and the same but has not been able to provide any independent verifiable proof that is the case rather than being conjecture.

Of particular concern is the use of testimonials that have no independent verification. As per WP:ABOUTSELF this is material that is self-serving and involves claims by third parties, as such there is significant doubt as to their authenticity. The article's creator has argued that "these are verifiable statements attributed to named individuals, not anonymous promotional content" however they are not verifiable and they have only been provided by the operators of the studio, not as press releases or statements provided by the artists/individuals.

Similarly, the creator has put forward that the studio is connected to a Grammy-nominated album, irrespective of WP:NOTINHERITED, none of the references collaborate that the album was recorded at Escape, only that "several of the tracks made during a six week studio trip the band took to Joshua Tree—even staying adjacent to the location its Live From Joshua Tree album was filmed and recorded on" but doesn't specifically mention which studio or that it was Esacpe studio. Dan arndt (talk) 06:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and California. Dan arndt (talk) 06:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Johnstone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable footballer. C 679 05:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and England. C 679 05:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Trumpota

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsure what specific rationale to say, but this is not useful at all. This disambiguation page has two non-English words, and a Wikipedia namespace subpage.

For the non-English words, this is the English Wikipedia. No specific words should be written in Slovak or Lithuanian, to my knowledge.

The WP: page is not helpful to readers nor helpful to editors. It requires context that would not necessitate the dab, and it generally is all so specific that barely anyone could find it helpful. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 05:16, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 05:16, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:DABFOREIGN aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 07:45, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Sugar Tax (talk) 10:15, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aya Ogawa (singer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sourcing is entirely routine and promotional, often interviews, which does not demonstrate individual notability per WP:SINGER or NACTOR and is perhaps TOOSOON. Per WP:BANDMEMBER article should be a redirect to Nogizaka46.

Admittedly, I cannot do a thorough WP:BEFORE in Japanese. English language searches do not return reliable sources on this Aya Ogawa. Japanese language article has more sources, and appears thorough, with a citation added as recently as January 18, but the sources are still largely promotional and I do not see SIGCOV. Almost of all of it is also still in reference to the band [3], so BANDMEMBER applies. A couple sources not about her work in the band are promotional [4] or trivial [5]. —BrechtBro (talk) 22:03, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, Music, Popular culture, and Japan. —BrechtBro (talk) 22:03, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Subject passes WP:GNG with coverage in Oricon News and Natalie.mu articles, which are reliable sources per WP:JAPAN/RS. I understand the WP:BANDMEMBER concern but independent notability seems to be established as of this year with their debut in TV dramas. MidnightMayhem (talk) 23:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Reliability isn't in doubt, but these articles are not SIGCOV. They are either entirely about her in relation to the band or they are trivial or promotional. The most significant one not about the band is this short piece in Oricon (Nogizaka46's Aya Ogawa's "blonde gal look" revealed, playing modern high school girl in vertical short drama). The natalie.mu source included has only two sentences about her, "[...] and Aya Ogawa (Nogizaka46) will appear as family members of Natsumi Ebata, the main character played by Yoshine." and "[...] Ogawa will play Natsumi's younger sister, Fuyuko." All the remaining Oricon coverage here, save an announcement reprint), is about her being in the band. One article begins, "The video of the fourth member of the idol group Nogizaka46 's 5th generation, who were announced to join on the 1st, was released on the YouTube channel "Nogizaka Streaming" at noon on the 5th, introducing 14-year-old Ogawa Aya from Chiba Prefecture..." [6]. —BrechtBro (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm a little concerned with the timing of your nomination because you opened a requested move saying Aya Ogawa (playwright) was the primary topic, but about 30 minutes after that discussion closed not exactly in your favour, you nominated this article for deletion. In your move request, you wrote: The top page linking to Aya Ogawa is incorrect and meant for the playwright. So is this a bad faith nomination? Limmidy (talk) 00:11, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Another participant in that discussion raised notability concerns and I looked into them, that's all there is to it. —BrechtBro (talk) 00:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that the nominator also started the Ogawa (playwright) article Lajmmoore (talk) 23:01, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Nogizaka46#Current members maybe WP:TOOSOON. The Ja-wiki sources contain the same problem maybe a WP:TOOSOON issue. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:54, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Suppprt per @Miminity's sentiment. The Aya Ogawa singer does have potential, but for now it's a little too early for her have her own wiki article. ~2026-61312-9 (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seeking a broader consensus and let's try to assume good faith here. The entirety of this discussion is to independently assess if the article meets our inclusion criteria. We've heard from the people above, let's hear from a few more people.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw ^talk 05:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Rojbin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not think this meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. As an article, it doesn't have enough sources to establish notability. As a DAB page, it only has one list item, which is on a different wiki. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:46, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Turkey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:21, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Near-miss G14. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:24, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Why is this not eligible for G14? Do links to non-English Wikipedias count? Kelob2678 (talk) 11:35, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It had significant non-disambiguation content. On second thought, maybe this was a G14 in the original version (before the update below). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 10:46, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a valid index without multiple entries, improper to redirect because only link is an ill, name itself not notable so an independent stub on it cannot be retained either. ~2026-39780-5 (talk) 00:59, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non Wikipedia:General sanctions/Kurds and Kurdistan not a extended confirmed user. WP:GS/KURD: non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have updated the page to a proper disambiguation format and created articles for the two notable subjects listed: Sevil Rojbin Çetin and Rojbin Erden. The page is no longer a 'near-miss G14' or a single-item list. I suggest the result of this discussion be Keep as a disambiguation page Huyrutan (talk) 14:45, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: it is not a disambiguation page but a valid and sourced given-name page. PamD 18:35, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the recent edits?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:25, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of works influenced by David Lynch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't seem to pass WP:LISTN and Lynch's influence is already adequately covered at Cultural impact of David Lynch, making this redundant fancruft. Should be redirected to either David Lynch#Legacy or Cultural impact of David Lynch#Influence. silviaASH (inquire within) 04:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Artists, Arts, Science fiction and fantasy, Film, Television, Video games, and Popular culture. silviaASH (inquire within) 04:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cultural impact of David Lynch#Influence. I believe every single item on the list is already in that section. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 05:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:39, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Brown Dodge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR, roles seem largely minor and/or unnamed. Can't find much about the musical projects she's been involved with, nor sig cov about her specifically to suggest WP:GNG pass. Zzz plant (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, and United States of America. Zzz plant (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Also fails WP:CREATIVE. WidgetKid ^{chat me} 04:33, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Dodge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One local news piece, the other sources here don't mention him specifically, just the broader trend of microdramas. Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR, insufficient sourcing for WP:GNG. If he does have a role in the upcoming film Bad Day it doesn't appear to be documented yet in reliable sources. Zzz plant (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and California. Zzz plant (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jasiškis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This single-family homestead (population: 2) does not pass WP:NGEO. It is thus necessary to meet WP:GNG, and there is no evidence in the article or from a BEFORE search that it does. A blank-and-redirect was contested by the page creator so I am seeking a consensus for a stable redirect to Alizava Eldership (elderships being Lithuania's smallest administrative division but much larger than this single-family home), Kupiškis District Municipality or some other appropriate target. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:43, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:43, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - "single-family homestead" is a translation of the Lithuanian term "lt:viensėdis" (or khutor) which is a recognized type of settlement in Lithuania. See Lithuanian wiki for historical population. Renata•3 03:08, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ per WP:GEOLAND. Now it is depopulated, but in the past it was inhabited by more than 100 people. Kelob2678 (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
1. I can't find the 164 figure in the provided source.

2. It's fairly implausible that a rural single-family homestead of this small size would have that many people. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The file lists two settlements that have 164 inhabitants, but neither is the one we need. However, it lists the settlement Ясишки on page 359, which had 147 inhabitants and was 47 versts from Panevėžys and 13 versts from Čypėnai [lt]. The settlement in this article is 47 kilometers from Panevėžys[7] and 10.5 kilometers from Čypėnai[8]. But in any case, the source labels it as a landed property, not a village, so it fails WP:GEOLAND, Delete. Kelob2678 (talk) 17:33, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 03:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Indirect evaporative cooling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any sources or references Dan arndt (talk) 03:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Draft space as WP:ATD. I found more info right away with my search, so likely meets WP:GNG, but not as written. WidgetKid ^{chat me} 05:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Widgetkid:, I did initially move it to draft and provided comment that it needed to be properly referenced and reviewed via the AfC process however the article's creator moved it straight back to main space without addressing the issue of referencing. Dan arndt (talk) 07:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

'Move to Draft as per the above, article likely would meet WP:NOTABILITY (as a significant number of sources can easily be found), however requires some work to expand & reference the article. Two pieces of toast (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found some references for the article, while I'm by no means an expert in the area, hopefully they should be sufficient for the article as it exists until it can be expanded.Two pieces of toast (talk) 09:23, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fateh Squad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not seem to meet notability criteria. It fails WP:GNG, none of the reliable sources are specifically about the Fateh Squad and/or specifically discuss and cover the unit with sufficient depth, and some of the (mainly Indian-origin) sources are of questionable reliability as well. RealKnockout (talk) 03:10, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Terrorism, and Pakistan. RealKnockout (talk) 03:10, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete LLM-generated cruft. Most of the references in the article don't even mention this at all. The one or two which do, only do so in passing. Fails basic GNG. Gotitbro (talk) 09:02, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ravichandra AJ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOEARLY. Why not wait for more sources and more films to release (as a producer)? Redirect to Blink (2024 film). DareshMohan (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Karnataka. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:45, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

TheFork Manager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail general notability guidelines and notability guidelines for companies. Sources used in the article do not establish notability because they are either not independent of the company or trivial coverage which is not significant coverage. BEFORE searches found similar sources such as routine press releases and product listings. --Seawolf35 ^T--C 02:54, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, Management, Software, and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Libya–Thailand relations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is entirely sourced from 1 source being the Thai Ministry of Foreign Affairs. I could not find any third party sources. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 02:48, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Libya, and Thailand. LibStar (talk) 02:48, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Leave aside SIGCOV, I couldn't find any WP:VRS that at least that speaks about this to some extent. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dizzy 3 and a Half: Into Magicland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game with only two sources cited. Suggest WP:MERGE with Magicland Dizzy as an WP:ATD. This looks like a small minigame used to promote the main game and distributed separately. Irrespective of whether the game is independently notable, as a matter of practicality it would seem that this one is so inextricably tied to Magicland Dizzy that it's an ideal merge candidate per WP:MERGEREASON. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge.

The game is already described in the “Development and promotion” section of Magicland Dizzy as a five-screen promotional mini-adventure distributed with Crash magazine and functioning as a direct prequel.

Merging this article would avoid duplication while preserving verifiable encyclopedic information in its appropriate context. Wolf july (talk) 10:33, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of football clubs in the Federated States of Micronesia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Useless and abandoned list Brosticate (talk) 01:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Football, and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:49, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yadavrao Tasgaonkar Institute of Engineering & Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely unsourced page. Fails [{WP:GNG]] and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:10, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Maharashtra. Shellwood (talk) 01:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to List of colleges in Mumbai#Engineering, where it's mentioned, under WP:ATD-R. Fails in basic WP:N, WP:V and GNG. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:02, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:50, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Him Academy Public School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG. Also WP:ITEXISTS Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:02, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Himachal Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 01:13, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There is a huge chunk of articles from The Tribune (India) but sadly, all of them are WP:ROUTINE coverages and WP:PASSING mentions of multiple school events like annual day celebration, sports events and blood donation camps. But there isn't a single source with SIGCOV. Hence, it fails in GNG as well as NSCHOOL. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pinegrove School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely unsourced page. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NSCHOOL, and WP:NSOURCE Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Himachal Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 01:13, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Plethora of sources found but sadly, most of them are WP:ROUTINE coverage about school events. But the school has also received some awards - [9] [10]. And these are some non-ROUTINE coverage - [11] [12]. Can these be enough to save the page? BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The sources which pass WP:ROUTINE do not really seem to discuss anything mentioned in the article, instead focusing on individual (admittedly impressive) events that have happened at the school. While these could therefore be used to source additional content to be added into the article, this would still leave the many body of the article entirely without sources, meaning it does not pass WP:SIGCOV. Two pieces of toast (talk) 09:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Government Model Senior Secondary School Dhundan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find much about this school or any SIGCOV sources for this page. This page is also almost (if not entirely) unsourced. Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:59, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Himachal Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 01:13, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It's surprising to see that the coverage about a 90+ years old school is almost nil. However, it fails in GNG and WP:VRS. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was Speedy Deleted. It was speedied by Dab as WP:A7 (non-admin closure) Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 09:22, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

American Fence Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is a small business in Arizona. There are many other businesses with the same name and sourcing level falls under WP:TRADES. It fails WP:NCORP. JeffBaseman (talk) 00:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No indication of importance. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 00:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ... If this were a top 50 privately held company in the US, I would favor keep, but the article cited seems to be about top 50 AZ companies, not at all the same thing. ++Lar: t/c 02:56, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Arizona. Shellwood (talk) 01:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no suggestion of notability. I will speedy. Deb (talk) 08:16, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Boiling points of the elements (data page)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTADATABASE — An anonymous username, not my real name 00:48, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chemistry-related deletion discussions. — An anonymous username, not my real name 00:48, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep SK1 and perhaps others. The term "boiling point" is something anyone over the age of 8 or so will understand, and needs no further explanation. There is significant encyclopedic relevance to this, and the nom has not made the case beyond referring to a WP page. More rationale is needed.Ldm1954 (talk) 01:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Ldm1954, I don't think you understood the nomination. This is part of a mass nomination of "data page" articles that fall outside the scope of Wikipedia. We have an article on boiling points, with which you perhaps confused this one, but we should not keep an indiscriminate collection of random boiling points. Also, referring to guidelines is how cases are made. — An anonymous username, not my real name 01:50, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
My Speedy Keep vote remains, I do not think you make a valid case. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:57, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the case is poorly made. Much of the linked information does not apply. The main aspect which does apply is "To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources." Thus a nomination phrased around this concept would be much more compelling. Johnjbarton (talk) 02:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This is the first sentence of the guideline I cited when making the case. — An anonymous username, not my real name 03:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The notion of a boiling point does indeed have encyclopedic relevance, which is why we have an article titled boiling point. The elements do as well, and they too have articles - hydrogen, helium, lithium, beryllium, and so on - and those articles even have infoboxes which include vital data like the boiling point. But this particular tabulation of data is not itself an encyclopedic topic. There is a good "master list" of the elements and their most important properties - including their boiling points - at List of chemical elements; we don't need another page dedicated to just this property. Omphalographer (talk) 02:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a waste of editor time. The whole batch of similar data pages should be discussed together with adequate nomination to start the process. In that case I would agree to delete the whole lot.

Johnjbarton (talk) 03:46, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a rather famous essay that addresses the absurdity of doing something like this... have you perhaps heard of SNOW? — An anonymous username, not my real name 04:45, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The chemical element infoboxes outright refer to these data pages as sources; without it, those pages suddenly become unreferenced. In any case, this is hardly an indiscriminate collection of information. There are 118 elements and their boiling points, where known, are a well-defined and interesting set. Double sharp (talk) 06:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- I also agree with the point Elemimele made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lithium chloride (data page), which I will quote: Encyclopedias have traditionally included small amounts of fundamental data in tabulated form; things like heights of tallest buildings, populations of countries, and some chemical things like melting-points of common metals. I'd say atomic radii and densities of elements are well worth keeping... Double sharp (talk) 10:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. These are already (minus unexplained disagreements) in Boiling point#Element table. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as argued by Ldm1954. Athel cb (talk) 09:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Melting points of the elements (data page)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTADATABASE — An anonymous username, not my real name 00:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chemistry-related deletion discussions. — An anonymous username, not my real name 00:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boiling points of the elements (data page); all the same reasoning applies here. Omphalographer (talk) 02:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep no rationale is provided. This should have been discussed first at WT:Chemistry for concensus involving experts.Ldm1954 (talk) 02:19, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The chemical element infoboxes outright refer to these data pages as sources; without it, those pages suddenly become unreferenced. In any case, this is hardly an indiscriminate collection of information. There are 118 elements and their melting points, where known, are a well-defined and interesting set. Double sharp (talk) 06:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- I also agree with the point Elemimele made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lithium chloride (data page), which I will quote: Encyclopedias have traditionally included small amounts of fundamental data in tabulated form; things like heights of tallest buildings, populations of countries, and some chemical things like melting-points of common metals. I'd say atomic radii and densities of elements are well worth keeping... Double sharp (talk) 10:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as argued by Ldm1954. Athel cb (talk) 09:41, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Atomic radii of the elements (data page)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTADATABASE — An anonymous username, not my real name 00:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chemistry-related deletion discussions. — An anonymous username, not my real name 00:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep no rationale is provided. This should have been discussed first at WT:Chemistry for concensus involving experts.Ldm1954 (talk) 02:18, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The chemical element infoboxes outright refer to these data pages as sources; without it, those pages suddenly become unreferenced. In any case, this is hardly an indiscriminate collection of information. There are 118 elements and their atomic radii, where known, are a well-defined and interesting set. Double sharp (talk) 06:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- I also agree with the point Elemimele made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lithium chloride (data page), which I will quote: Encyclopedias have traditionally included small amounts of fundamental data in tabulated form; things like heights of tallest buildings, populations of countries, and some chemical things like melting-points of common metals. I'd say atomic radii and densities of elements are well worth keeping... Double sharp (talk) 10:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: this is a WP:NLIST of periodic table elements, a fundamental concept in chemistry. Each row corresponds to a well-established chemical element with values taken from standard textbooks and peer-reviewed sources. This is scientific reference material, not an indiscriminate database. HerBauhaus · talk 08:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as argued by Ldm1954. Athel cb (talk) 10:03, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Porter (humanitarian)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While Porter has raised funds and awareness for some good causes, I find no evidence of notability. Coverage is limited to churnalism and paid for placements. Her company doesn't have an article -and does not appear notable - so there is no available ATD Star Mississippi 20:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Afghanistan, and United Kingdom. Star Mississippi 20:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - poorly sourced; one reliable source, Vice, and 3 citations to unknown sources are not enough for a BLP. Ping me if you find and add 2 better sources. Bearian (talk) 23:44, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete overly promotional. Lacking quality sources to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 04:17, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:PROMO Agnieszka653 (talk) 19:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The Guardian, Evrim Ağacı, Reuters, The Telegraph HKLionel TALK 11:59, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nyabira

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:GNG. No evidence this passes WP:GEOLAND.4meter4 (talk) 20:24, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 20:24, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:36, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mashonaland West Province as an WP:ATD per nom. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 15:01, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, there are tons of results on Google Books Kowal2701 (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please list examples of WP:SIGCOV. Search hits aren't evidence of in-depth or reliable coverage.4meter4 (talk) 05:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Adnan Asif Jah Shad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable solider. Not involved in any engagements or assigned to any significant posts. All sources are routine coverage or mere passing mentions. –DMartin (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://jang.com.pk/news/1230035				? Unknown
https://www.asf.gov.pk/our-heros/director-general-asf-maj-gen-asif-jah-shad-hi-m/n	Govt publication	~	Bio	✘ No
https://www.nation.com.pk/29-Jun-2018/37-brigadiers-made-major-generals			entry in list of 37 people	✘ No
https://arynews.tv/six-major-generals-promoted-lieutenant-general			single entry in list of names	✘ No
https://www.nation.com.pk/07-Sep-2019/punjab-pledges-1965-war-like-sacrifices-on-defence-day			passing mention	✘ No
https://mediaonlinetoday.com/dg-airport-security-force-maj-gen-adnan-asif-jah-shad-called-on-finance-minister-senator-ishaq-dar-at-finance-division/			~ Routine coverage of a meeting	~ Partial
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/1284252-corps-commander-lauds-asf-s-efforts-to-ensure-foolproof-security-at-country-s-airports			passing mention	✘ No
https://www.dawn.com/news/1614390			entry in list of names	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and Aviation. –DMartin (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - only 2-Star and sourcing is very light. Bearian (talk) 21:52, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:38, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:28, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:07, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Tiruvarur Vaidyanathan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article relies on only two sources, and all other claims other than the awards and honours section are not supported with inline citations and therefore not verifiable per WP:V and WP:BLP Has not had any tangible improvement since at least October last year. Carolina2k22 • (talk) 00:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Carolina2k22 • (talk) 00:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and India. Shellwood (talk) 00:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning Keep: The award he received is notable, passing Wp:ANYBIO. Other concerns about the content and sourcing could be addressed. Zuck28 (talk) 02:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Move to Draft, as this is barely an article. I did find an additional source that could be used to improve it. WidgetKid ^{chat me} 03:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I've fixed the received award (he got it in 2017, not 2018). The award qualifies him under WP:ANYBIO as a a well-known and significant award or honor. A national recognition for contributions in music certainly qualifies under that. --Seawolf35 ^T--C 03:25, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes #1 criterion of WP:ANYBIO. Sangeet Natak Akademi Award is a highly notable award. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:27, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: WP:HEYMAN and WP:SNOW applicable here. Zuck28 (talk) 04:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:53, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Files

File:This Is Acting (Deluxe Edition) (Official Album Cover) by Sia.png

Not sufficiently different from the standard cover nor critically significant enough to warrant use as a 2nd non-free image; see WP:NFCC 3. estar8806 (talk) ★ 00:09, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Move Your Body (Sean Paul song)

Move Your Body (Sean Paul song) → Sean Paul discography (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Move Your Body (Sean Paul Song) → Sean Paul (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at either target, leaving readers unable to find the information they may be looking for. (Note: Move Your Body (Sean Paul Song) is a {{R with history}} as a result of a WP:BLAR after being an article for about a week in 2017.) Steel1943 (talk) 04:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep redirect. Like it or not, this was released as a single, is currently not part of any album, and should be on the list of singles on his discography. Easy solution. HUMANXANTHRO (What you say about his company is what you say about society) 19:12, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The issue here is that the two redirects don't go to the same target when they're only one letter off?

Also, if it's unmentioned, either there's a good reason, or it should be added. One of the two. And that needs to be something that happens before a redirect points to the article; as per WP:RETURNTORED if we don't have the information, we shouldn't have a redirect that says we do. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 22:34, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the song gets appropriately mentioned on his bio or discography article, I'm inclined to say delete as implausible targeting. It makes no sense to redirect a page that doesn't even bring the subject up at all. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:28, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:19, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian politics/leadership election

Template:Canadian politics/leadership election → Category:Canada leadership elections infobox templates (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is an improper cross namespace redirect. Gonnym (talk) 09:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Italian Alps

Italian Alps → Alps (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The existence of this redirect showing up on search results makes it look to readers like we have an article on the Italian alps. We don't, not even a section at the target. We could retarget to Northern Italy#Geography, which is reasonably informative, or delete the redirect. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 20:27, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Italy is mentioned dozens of times in Alps. Shouldn't that article just be improved to further clarify the geography of the mountains in the countries they overlay? BD2412 T 22:37, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It's a bit shocking that unlike other languages (d:Q3509494) we don't have an article here. There's the French Alps, Swiss Alps, and even an article on the very delimitation of the Alps, but not the Italian Alps. Over 100 articles link to this redirect. But given how the Alps are traditionally divided East/West rather than North/South, an article would be a bit of a hodgepodge. That can be seen in other languages' articles. In the interest of avoiding redundancy and helping the very many readers who come across redirect, I think a better idea than a redlink, which still encourages article creation, is a very short broad-concept article that briefly discusses Italian aspects of the Alps (like French Alps does) but mostly focusses on directing readers to the different subranges of the Italian Alps (e.g. Cottian Alps, Bergamasque Alps). Like it:Alpi italiane, but for now in much less detail. J 947 ‡ ^edits 22:51, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm generally thinking along the same lines as J947 but my first thought was a list to complement Category:Mountain ranges of the Alps. If that were structured by country we could target this to Mountain ranges of Alps#Italy but I'm not sure how optimal that organisation would be? Thryduulf (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:52, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thalaivar

Thalaivar → Rajinikanth (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Quite a specific redirect for a generic Tamil term. "Thalaivar" (தலைவர்), or "leader" could refer to any politician, actor, etc. While he is known as "thalaivar" occasionally, the term is so generic that it could be referring to somebody else. Furthermore, it isn't mentioned in the article, as a Ctrl+F for "Thalaivar" returns nothing in the prose. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 02:28, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Whatever be the generic nature of the term, that it is especially related to the actor is not deniable. I had created the redirect after coming across a number of the actor's films which directly referenced this moniker in their working titles: Thalaivar 169, Thalaivar 170, Thalaivar 171. Any other usages, if needed, can be easily disambiguated. Gotitbro (talk) 04:09, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:24, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Skadoosh

Skadoosh → Kung Fu Panda (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Skidoosh → Kung Fu Panda (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete as unmentioned. Thepharoah17 (talk) 04:39, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wuxia Fingerhold

Wuxia Fingerhold → Kung Fu Panda (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Wuxi finger hold → Kung Fu Panda (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Wuxi Finger Hold → Kung Fu Panda (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete as unmentioned, the caps ones were just unsourced BLARs. Thepharoah17 (talk) 04:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jonah Hex (Arrowverse Earth-18)

Jonah Hex (Arrowverse Earth-18) → List of Legends of Tomorrow characters#Jonah Hex (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirect for a gag character who appears for one scene in one episode Olliefant (she/her) 00:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Why does it matter? The character is still in the list article. Why would you make it harder for users to find information that still exists on a page? Gonnym (talk) 07:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Since it seems the original mention was changed, the redirect can target the entry at Crisis on Infinite Earths (Arrowverse)#Batwoman. Gonnym (talk) 07:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Umbrage Ng

Umbrage NgUmbrage Ng → Ng Yat Chung (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I wish that it would be deleted as it is a nickname given to him over a statement he made GhostJp (talk) 03:06, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Templates and Modules

Template:Airports in the Middle East

Template:Airports in the Middle East (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The infobox is unnecessary. No one really cares for a box that specifically leads to the "busiest airports in the middle east". The pages that it does lead to are very specific lists for Turkey and Iran, a single airport for Northern Cyprus, and the general list of airports in Israel. All the other countries are redlinked. Also, the formatting is terrible. Also, Palestine & Gaza don't have airports, to say nothing about having 'busiest airports'. Overall, its a useless template that links to two places.TimeEngineer (talk) 11:02, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A gold bar for you!

Template:A gold bar for you! (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, recently created and unlikely to be useful due to the hardcoded signature in the template. Sugar Tax (talk) 10:12, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It is a pity that the Chinese article that this relates to is so poorly sourced, otherwise the English version of the article could be restored and improved. It is obviously a significant line. Somebody listed some sources, but made no effort to improve the article.--Grahame (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable software release/Renren

Template:Latest stable software release/Renren (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release template. Gonnym (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable software release/Procreate (software)

Template:Latest stable software release/Procreate (software) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release template. Gonnym (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Edge

Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Edge (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release template. Gonnym (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable software release/Firefox Sync

Template:Latest stable software release/Firefox Sync (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release template as Firefox Sync was redirected. Gonnym (talk) 09:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest preview software release/Opera

Template:Latest preview software release/Opera (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release template. Gonnym (talk) 09:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest preview software release/Inkscape

Template:Latest preview software release/Inkscape (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release template. Gonnym (talk) 09:03, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest preview software release/Gwyddion

Template:Latest preview software release/Gwyddion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release template. Gonnym (talk) 09:03, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Attached KML/Metrorail (Miami-Dade County)

Template:Attached KML/Metrorail (Miami-Dade County) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used at Metrorail (Miami-Dade County). Gonnym (talk) 08:59, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Verizon 200 at the Brickyard

Template:Verizon 200 at the Brickyard (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Seems to have been replaced with Template:Brickyard 400. Gonnym (talk) 08:55, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Template:United States Football League (2022–2023) head coaches

Template:United States Football League (2022–2023) head coaches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as the league is no more. Gonnym (talk) 08:54, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellany

Deletion review

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creating articles Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and voting	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Files

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:Navarrese titular monarchs holding possessions in Upper Navarre

Category:Companies of the United States by location

Category:Army installations by country

Category:1879 Argentine novels

Category:Companies of Armenia by date

Category:Thurmond, West Virginia

Category:Typographers and type designers

Redirects

Move Your Body (Sean Paul song)

Template:Canadian politics/leadership election

Italian Alps

Thalaivar

Skadoosh

Wuxia Fingerhold

Jonah Hex (Arrowverse Earth-18)

Umbrage Ng

Templates and Modules

Miscellany

Deletion review